Moore Lies? (July 12, 2004)
Michael Moore is at it again with his new Bush bashing, conspiracy theory, "documentary". I haven't seen Mr. Moore's film yet and I don't plan to until it comes out on DVD and I can rent it. What I can't stand about Moore is that he tries bringing this crap off as truth. It's not. It's a far cry from truth, Spielberg's "E.T." is closer to the truth then this piece of propaganda.

Liberals don't like to admit it but what Moore sells is propaganda. His lies and deceptions have been documented in what has become an internet industry of recording Moore's lies. What Moore does is extraordinary. He can deceive and twist the truth without uttering a single false word. He spins facts and keeps information from us in his films and books to push his far Left political agenda.

For example, in "Bowling for Columbine", Moore tells us the sad story of a six year old girl who is shot by a fellow student. The boy that shoots the girl is shown as a neglected child who spends no time with his mother because she was being worked non-stop due to the state's fare-to-work-laws. What Moore fails to mention is that the relative the boy's mother entrusted to watch over him was running the neighborhood's crack house, the gun had been stolen and left on the bed, the boy's father was in prison for theft and drug offensives, and that the boy's mother had admitted duct taping another son's hands, feet, and mouth and then sitting on the boy and beating him. Oh, and one more thing, a few weeks later the boy's aunt and grandmother were arrested for selling narcotics. Funny how Moore left that out.

Another deception in "Columbine" is the part where Moore is in a Canadian Wal-Mart and buys bullets without showing ID. Canada has pointed out that this would be illegal. Since a Canadian law passed in 1998, ammunition buyers must show ID. So either Moore staged the scene or is running from Canadian police.

Another lie in this "documentary" is Moore's little cartoon where he links the National Rifle Association (NRA) with the KKK. Moore lies to his audience once again. He never mentions that the NRA was formed by Union generals after the Civil War and that the first 10 presidents of the NRA were former Union generals. He also fails to mention that the KKK got most of its help from Democrats in Washington who wanted to foil the Republican reconstruction of the South.

But back to "Fahrenheit 9/11". In the movie Moore says that the Taliban visited Texas when Bush was governor to discuss a possible pipeline deal with Unocal. Bush and the Taliban in a money deal? Oh how the Liberals would love it, to bad it's not true. Moore does not mention however, that they never met with Bush or that the deal failed in 1998 or that it had been supported by the Clinton administration. Ah shucks! Another deception uncovered.

Moore also gets into the friend of George Bush, James Bath. Bath became the money manager of the Bin Laden family (who don't support Osama, especially since he has called them traitors and enemies of Islam). Moore says in the film, "James Bath himself in turn invested in George W. Bush." Moore is trying to make the implication that Bath invested the Bin Laden family's money in Bush's energy company, Arbusto. But Moore fails to state that Bath has said he had invested HIS money in Bush's company and not the Bin Ladens. Presto! Another lie uncovered!

This next one really makes me wonder if Moore was thinking at all (but then again, he is a college dropout). In the film, Moore states the fact that the Bin Laden family was quickly sent back to Saudi Arabia after the 9/11 attacks. I found this very strange and just plain stupid. But according to an interview given to The Hill, it was Richard Clarke, yes Clarke, another member of the Bush Bashing Brigade, who authorized the Bin Ladens to fly back to Saudi Arabia. Of course Moore steers clear of mentioning this.

According to a recent column by Matt Labash in an issue of The Weekly Standard who has seen the film, Moore takes us back to Iraq on the eve of the war and shows us "placid scenes of an untroubled land on the brink of imperial annihilation. With all the leisurely strolling and kite-flying, it is unclear if Iraqis are living under a murderous dictatorship or in a Valtrex commercial. In Moore's telling of the invasion, the shock-and-awe is less high-value-target/smart-bombing, more Dresden/Hiroshima. According to the footage that ensues, our pilots seem to have hit nothing but women and children. If Moore's documentarian gig were to fall through, he could easily seek employment as an Al Jazeera cameraman."

Moore is a liar. That's the only way to put it. Moore lies, he deceives, and he spits out garbage. His movie "connects dots that aren't there". Michael Moore hates America. You just have to look at the man and know that he really doesn't like America. Some of you might be saying, no he doesn't! But look at his films, look at the picture he paints of America. He makes us look like racist, gun crazy, murderers who are out there to rule the world.

After September 11th, only a few days after 3,000 Americans had lost there lives, Moore was saying that we deserved it! Yes, he said that America had it coming! He also wrote, "If someone did this to get back at Bush, then they did so by killing thousands of people who did not vote for him! Boston, New York, D.C., and the planes' destination of California - these were places that voted against Bush! Why kill them?". Can you get anymore ignorant and disgustingly rude Mr. Moore?

Another lie of Moore's is that he supports the troops. Well, Mr. Moore, if you support the troops then why does your film make the troops look like savages who are ravaging the Iraqi hillsides? If you support the troops Mr. Moore, then why in an interview to a London paper did you say, "after my movie the troops are really f***** now!"?

He claims in his films that Americans are too afraid of our neighbors. But what do Moore's films do? They makes us even more afraid of our neighbors! In "Bowling for Columbine" he makes us think that our neighbors will gun us down if we say they have a bad haircut, in "Fahrenheit 9/11" he makes us fear the government officials we have elected.

Michael Moore is a propagandist. He lies and Liberals take his lies for truth. Moore's film creates a real problem for Kerry though that could work in Bush's favor.

If Kerry doesn't distance himself from the Left wing extremists, Kerry will lose support from Americans who dismiss extremists for what they are, nut balls. So Mr. Moore, go ahead and keep making your films that Liberals are even saying are propaganda. They may just backfire on you.